大数据权利的知识产权化路径研究

黄静怡

高科技与产业化 ›› 2025, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12) : 117.

主管:中国科学院
主办:中国科学院文献情报中心、中国高科技产业化研究会
ISSN:1006-222X
CN:11-3556/N
高科技与产业化 ›› 2025, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12) : 117.
知识产权

大数据权利的知识产权化路径研究

  • 黄静怡
作者信息 +

Research on the Intellectual Property Approach to Big Data Rights

  • HUANG Jingyi
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

数据财产说基于传统物权思维,强调绝对排他性,但易导致数据垄断、阻碍流通。而知识产权化路径的有限排他权设计,平衡创新激励与社会利用,更适合于数据作为生产要素的本质。知识产权化可以很好地激励数据投资和创新,防止滥用,并以分层保护应对独创性不足的质疑。实施路径上短期以司法扩大适用《反不正当竞争法》等既有法律作为过渡保护,长期立法创设专门制度,明确保护对象和权利内容,与《数据安全法》、《反垄断法》协同保护,最终形成“有限排他权+分层保护+权能拆分” 的平衡框架,实现数据安全高效的流通与公共利益最大化。

Abstract

Data, as a key production factor in the digital economy, raises complex questions regarding rights allocation. Traditional property-based approaches emphasize absolute exclusivity, which can easily lead to data monopolies and hinder data circulation. In contrast, the intellectual property (IP)-oriented model, characterized by limited exclusivity and layered protection, better aligns with the non-rival, replicable, and dynamic nature of data. This paper argues that the IP approach strikes a more appropriate balance between innovation incentives and public interest. In the short term, judicial expansion through the Anti-Unfair Competition Law and Copyright Law provides transitional protection; in the long term, legislation should establish a specialized data IP system featuring clear protection objects, limited exclusive rights, and functional splitting of data-related entitlements. Ultimately, a framework of “limited exclusivity + layered protection + disaggregated powers” can promote secure and efficient data flows and maximize social benefits.

关键词

大数据 / 知识产权化 / 数据财产说 / 排他权 / 公共利益

Key words

big data / intellectual property / data property theory / exclusivity / public interest

引用本文

导出引用
黄静怡. 大数据权利的知识产权化路径研究[J]. 高科技与产业化. 2025, 31(12): 117
HUANG Jingyi. Research on the Intellectual Property Approach to Big Data Rights[J]. High-Technology and Commercialization. 2025, 31(12): 117

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/