本文以全国首例虚拟数字人Ada侵权案为样本，界定真人驱动、算法驱动两类数字人技术特征，厘清虚拟数字人不具备著作权主体资格，区分数字人形象、宣传视频、动捕素材的可版权性标准。该案明确权属划分规则，打击仿冒不正当竞争行为，为虚拟数字人行业确权、合规经营与创新发展提供司法指引。

This article takes the first virtual digital human Ada infringement case in the country as a sample, defines the technical characteristics of two types of digital humans, real-person-driven and algorithm-driven, clarifies that virtual digital humans do not have the qualifications for copyright subjects, and distinguishes digital human images, promotional videos, and motion capture materials. Copyright standards. This case clarifies the rules for the division of ownership, cracks down on counterfeiting and unfair competition, and provides judicial guidance for the confirmation of rights, compliant operation and innovation of the virtual digital human industry.